Corruption court acquits NRD official of issuing fake MyKad charge

KOTA KINABALU: A mother of nine cried tears of joy after the Special Corruption Court here cleared the National Registration Department (NRD) assistant registrar of a charge of issuing a fake identity card on Tuesday (Sept 27).

Safiah Alijang, 53, was charged under Section 463 of the Penal Code for allegedly making the fake MyKad for one Muhamad Daniel Hafiez Alif @ Jali at the NRD office in Sabah’s northern Pitas district at 3.05pm on May 22, 2013.

The offence, punishable under Section 465 of the same Code, provides for a jail term of up to two years or a fine or both, on conviction.

Sessions Court Judge Abu Bakar Manat, however, ruled that the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case and subsequently acquitted Safiah of the charge.

Having been suspended since 2018 due to the case, Safiah was left in tears after the court announced its verdict.

Her closest family members - her husband and daughter - looked calm as they sat in the public gallery after the judge read out his ruling.

Outside the courtroom later, Safiah, who was on bail pending the disposal of the case, expressed her gratitude to her lawyer Azhier Farhan Arisin and her family.

“I feel like I died and came back to life. I'm grateful as I'm cleared of the charge. I couldn't contain my joy when I heard the court's decision," she said, trying to hold back her emotions.

Appearing for the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission was deputy public prosecutor Nartiah F. Mirchele Sambatan who had produced 18 witnesses for the case since the trial started on June 15, 2020.

In his broad grounds of decision earlier, Judge Abu Bakar said the evidence was clear in that the accused was not the person who made the false entry into the NRD’s iJPN system.

Accordingly, he added, the accused cannot be said to “make the false document” and commit forgery.

He said the prosecution also failed to resolve the contradiction of evidence among the prosecution witnesses.

Judge Abu Bakar said in such a case where the prosecution led with two sets of evidence, each of which contradicts and strikes at the other, the court was left with no reliable and trustworthy evidence upon which a conviction of the accused might be based.

Azhier Farhan

Azhier Arisin & Jaafar, Lot A3-2, 2nd Floor, Block A, Plaza Utama, Jalan Pintas Penampang, Penampang, Sabah, 89500, Malaysia088 727 787general@azhierlaw.com

Disclaimer:

Whilst every care is taken in the preparation of the information contained in this web portal and blog, no warranty, express or implied is given by Azhier Arisin & Jaafar (“the Firm”) as to the completeness and accuracy of the information given and the Firm is not responsible for any errors or omissions which may occur. Under at no circumstances will the Firm be liable or responsible for any damages whatsoever, including without limitation, special, indirect, or consequential arising out of or related to the use or reliance of the information contained in it, whether by action in contract or tort or otherwise howsoever. This webpage is specifically designed in accordance with the Advocates (Website) Rules 2013 and Advocates (Practice and Etiquette) Rules 1988  and purely for informative purposes only not to be taken as a form of publicity. 

 

Suite A3-2, 2nd Floor, Block A, Plaza Utama, Jalan Pintas Penampang, 88300 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia.

Tel | +60 088 727787

Fax | +60 088 723787

E-mail | general@azhierlaw.com

All Rights Reserved © 2015-2024 | Messrs. Azhier Arisin & Jaafar | Advocates & Solicitors | Peguambela & Peguamcara

Proudly Made in Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia

Cart (0)